Generally, the third-person point of view is more common in publishing and is usually accepted by all publishers and agents without complaint. You're almost never going to get asked by an editor or an agent to change your novel from third-person to first-person; the reverse is more likely to happen.
In first person point of view the narrator is a character in the story telling it from their perspective. In third person point of view the narrator is not part of the story and the characters never acknowledge the narrator's presence. Less common than first and third is second person point of view.
While first-person writing offers intimacy and immediacy between narrator and reader, third-person narration offers the potential for both objectivity and omniscience. This effectively makes both forms of narration appealing to both first-time and seasoned writers.
Third person point of view is perhaps the most commonly used perspective. It can give the author more flexibility than the other two perspectives, especially with third person multiple or omniscient. The advantage of third person is that the author can write from a broader perspective.
Third person makes writing more objective and less personal. For academic and professional writing, this sense of objectivity allows the writer to seem less biased and, therefore, more credible.
Writing in third-person perspective is hard - much harder than first-person. Why? Because we see and experience the world through our own perspective - our patterns of beliefs, experiences, hopes, fears. We have opinions, thoughts, ideas, and desires.
Second person is rare in literary fiction.
Second Person Point of View
This is a strange POV and is very rarely used in literature.
First-Person Point of View
Of all the ways to tell a story, this point of view is the easiest to use because the writer is "in conversation" with the reader, and it's easy to stay in character.
Third person has a wider narrative scope than its first and second-person counterparts, and can shine the spotlight on more than one character. These multiple angles give a reader a 360-degree view of the plot, each adding information that another character doesn't have, creating a rich, complex narrative.
If you are referring to someone who is present in the third present, regardless of the gender, is rude or at least is something you must avoid. If you use pronouns such as he and she during the conversation which that person is present in, it makes them feel that the conversation is about them, not with them.
Stephen King wrote many books in the first person: Rage, Christine, Dolores Claiborne, Green Mile, and Bag of Bones are a few among them. First-person is an excellent choice for King as he can bring the reader into the main character's mind and tell us exactly what they're going through.
In addition to creating empathy and intimacy between the reader and the viewpoint character, the third person limited perspective benefits from greater objectivity. First person narrators can have biases, limited self-awareness, or a reluctance to share crucial facts 一 making them unreliable at times.
According to Freud—and most memory researchers today—the third-person perspective occurs due to reconstructive processes at recall. An alternative possibility is that the third-person perspective have been adopted when the actual event is experienced and later recalled in its original form.
From the writer's standpoint, first person is so popular because it's a storyteller's natural point of view, baked into our genes from prehistory when we huddled around fires recounting how we killed that giant woolly mammoth or escaped that hungry cave bear. So that's simply the way many of us start writing.
An unreliable narrator is an untrustworthy storyteller, most often used in narratives with a first-person point of view. The unreliable narrator is either deliberately deceptive or unintentionally misguided, forcing the reader to question their credibility as a storyteller.
Third Person Limited Omniscient
Limited omniscient is the point of view where the author allows the reader to view the events of the story through several character's eyes, but only one character at a time. You are getting a limited point of view from different narrators.
5th person perspective: The Anthropocene as a perspective
Humans are no longer merely actors in the system whose psychology and actions can be objectively modeled and predicted. They are, in a sense, the system; their thoughts, ideas and beliefs about the system are shaping and shaped by its evolution and trajectory.
Jane Austen's novels are told in the third person by an omniscient narrator who has access to the thoughts and feelings of the characters.
The second-person point of view is rarely used in fiction because it can be very difficult to do well. Many writers have found that it can be hard to develop a set of characters and a story in which the second person is appropriate.
J.K Rowling took six years to write Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, the first book in the Harry Potter series. It was published on 26 June, 1997 and the bestselling fantasy novel series is marking its 20th anniversary in 2017.
Not enough distance. First person allows the protagonist to have a more dynamic voice than any of the other points of view. However, it can be challenging for the writer to put enough distance between their personal voice and the character's true voice.
Second person is widely known as the most difficult point of view to pull off as a writer. Using “you,” “your,” and “yours,” it makes the reader the main character and is not the same as when a narrator addresses a reader.
The first-person point of view allows you to tell a more personal story. It's easier to write in the first person than it is to write in the third person, because it gives an immediacy and intimacy that puts the reader directly into your protagonist's head, rather than having the reader observe from afar.