If you look at the Siberian population of wolves and tigers both of whom are larger than their southern counterparts, the situation is clear: no matter how many wolves there are in a pack, they always lose to a single tiger.
A tiger would easily win a fight against a wolf. The tiger weighs almost three times as much as a wolf, tipping the scale at 600 pounds. The tiger can run up to 40mph, too, more than enough speed to match or exceed a wolf. Wolves tend to hunt in packs, and they rarely come up against anything as deadly as a tiger.
At least 10 to 15 to kill a tigress and to kill a male I bet 20 to even 30 wolves if the male is too big, aggressive and experienced. I've read about an incident in Siberia when a wolf pack attacked a large male tiger when it entered their territory. The tiger ended up killing 12 wolves but it didn't die.
They can take down larger prey than themselves, but they rely on their hunting pack to share the ordeal. All in all, the lion has an offensive advantage in this fight. Lions are far deadlier attackers than wolves with a bite force that could be as high as 1,000 PSI along with 4-inch teeth.
A grizzly can weigh almost twice as much as an African lion, so they can soak up more damage. The lion is faster over short distances though, so its best bet ... However, a lion could easily outrun a bear and ambush it. Together with the pack, a lion could beat a grizzly in a fight.
A large grizzly bear would probably beat a pack of wolves in a fight to the death.
In the battle of the grizzly bear vs tiger, a Siberian tiger would win a fight against a grizzly bear. The Siberian tiger is an ambush predator, and it's the only big cat that comes close to the grizzly bear in terms of size and power.
The pack of wolves has an advantage in hunting due to its larger numbers, while the grizzly bear is more than capable of taking on a single wolf thanks to its strength and size. However, when faced with either animal, your best bet for survival is quickly escaping the situation!
However, a lion coalition of 2–3 males would have a clear advantage over a lone tiger. A group of 2–4 female lions would have a similar advantage over a lone tigress. They conclude that while one on one, a tiger would certainly best a lion, in the wild the lion pride could hold their own against the solitary tiger.
In the frozen tundra of the arctic circle, polar bears would likely win the fight. The scale tips in favor of the tiger in every other environment.
A tiger would kill a gorilla in a fight. If a tiger managed to ambush a gorilla, the tiger would immediately kill it. Although the gorilla is strong, the fact is that it could not stop 600 pounds of charging muscle and teeth.
Tiger. Tigers are the largest and strongest species of all big cats. Of the ten sub-species found across Asia, the Siberian tiger is the largest at almost 2.5 meters long and around 300kg. Tigers are known to be able to carry kills up to twice their own body weight – not only along the ground but many meters up a tree.
A lion would win in a fight against a wolf. Although lions and wolves are both carnivores with potent fighting abilities, a lion is overwhelmingly larger and stronger than a wolf.
The Kodiak bear can be twice as heavy, longer in body, and much taller than the Siberian tiger. This mammal has a huge body, thick fur, and all sorts of protection in its body to make the fight last a long time. If the Siberian tiger was lucky and landed a fatal ambush blow, it could defeat this bear.
There were numerous reports of tigers preying on both brown bears and Asiatic black bears, but the relationship, it seems, was not that simple; there were also reports of bears killing tigers.
Such reckless behavior can cause the two species to clash. In some instances, the fight ends in the bear's favor, in which case they will eat the tiger, although they don't typically stalk tigers as prey.
Lion have more speed, but they are used to hunting in packs, not individually. So a lion would have trouble fighting a polar bear alone. But if there was a fight between a polar bear and a PACK of lions, well, then the lions would definitely win.
A hyena would win a fight against a wolf. The hyena is faster, heavier, and stronger than the wolf, and those are the only two appreciable differences between these creatures. They're both similar in stature and speed, but the fight would be determined by which creature can deal fatal damage.
Being able to take down the mighty lion in combat is quite an impressive feat, but there are many other creatures in the animal kingdom that a grizzly bear simply could not defeat. The African elephant is one such opponent.
An elephant would beat a bear in a fight. Even though we have granted this hypothetical bear the best features of all the various species, the fact remains that they cannot do enough damage to kill an adult elephant. A fully grown bull elephant would most likely smell or hear a bear coming long before it showed up.
Although a silverback gorilla is very fast, quite strong, and has a longer arm span, it is unlikely that a silverback could defeat the much larger and faster grizzly bear in a fair fight.