Beginners are welcome, 1300 is more than enough. The best 16 year olds are at least master strength already. A competitive rating for a national under 16 tourney would be around class A to expert, lets say 1700-2100. You're not going to win the whole thing but you'll be in the pack somewhere.
If you a 14 year old started at 6 and was on a serious training program and was 1000 at 14... that would be awful. If a 14 year old learned the moves a month ago and trained on his own and is 1000 then that's fairly impressive. In either case as long as they are having fun and learning...it's great.
0-1000: either a kid or a beginner. 1000-1200: below average player. 1200: either an average player or a newly registered member. 1200-1400: a decent chess player.
* 0-1000: either a kid or a beginner. * 1000-1200: below average player. * 1200: either an average player or a newly registered member. * 1200-1400: a decent chess player.
100 Elo rating points per years old to be considered a talent. So, 1300 for a 13 year old. 1800 for an 18 year old. 2400 for a 24 year old....if you're trying to make a name for yourself in chess.
1300 is a good ratings for a 13 year old.
A chess rating of 1300 means that you are a fairly skilled player. You know most of the openings, you can find tactics when they arise, and you have a good understanding of chess strategy. However, you still make some mistakes and need to work on your game.
You're never too young, or old for chess! Keep trying and you will get better at it. Don't let age stop you from playing the best board game of all time.
A competitive rating for a national under 16 tourney would be around class A to expert, lets say 1700-2100. You're not going to win the whole thing but you'll be in the pack somewhere. But really that's just if you started young and have a coach and have been going to tournaments for years.
It's never too late! I started playing more seriously in 2017 (age 14) with probably 1200-1300 strength. Now I am 1900-2000 online (sadly 1650 OTB, rarely playing IRL) and won some good OTB tournaments. With work and patience you get there for sure!!
The bad news is, 2000 is higher than the vast majority of people make it. The good news is that that alone doesn't mean that you can't. It varies from person to person, depending on how much time and talent they have to dedicate to chess. I would say that 2000 rating doesn't take talent, it takes time and effort.
The real answer is about 800-1000 on Chess.com. A bit higher in USCF. Would be great if you're already 2500 as 13 year old but if not then anything over 2000.. or maybe even 1800.
Career. Mishra broke the United States Chess Federation record for youngest Expert by earning a 2000 USCF rating at the age of 7 years, 6 months, and 22 days, breaking the record of Awonder Liang.
General range of ratings
Ratings could range from 100 to nearly 3000. You may lose your rating points or gain them. But you cannot lose your US Chess rating.
How good is a 1200 chess rating? An elo rating of 1200 in chess means that you're an intermediate player. You know the basics of chess, you know a few openings, you spot some tactics and you get strategy. But you don't know all the chess openings yet and you play many inaccuracies and some blunders.
Players rated above that are masters, while players below that are class players. Approximately 50,000 chess players have USCF ratings, of which approximately 2,500 are rated 2000 or better.
While some children will be ready to learn the game by age 4, the consensus among chess teachers seems to be that second grade -- meaning age 7 or 8 -- is the ideal time to start.
no, because age doesn't matter in playing chess. There's no age limit.
GM Wei Yi 2726 | #23
Chinese GM Wei Yi is an elite player and one of the greatest chess prodigies in history. At the age of 15, he broke GM Magnus Carlsen's record for the youngest player to reach a rating of 2700, which Wei still holds. Two years prior, he became the fourth-youngest GM in history at the time (now...
Always Letting Them Win is a Losing Strategy
At Story Time Chess, we couldn't agree more. Letting your child win every game creates just as many problems as constantly wiping them off the board. That's because problem solving skills can't evolve unless they're put to the test.
The younger you start, the easier it will be to become a GM. That said, it's never too late to begin. There are examples of players who started late before blooming into some of the greatest players in history, like Mikhail Chigorin, who learned to play at 16 and did not start playing seriously until late in his 20's.
if you want to be a a serious competitor, then yes, 13 y/o is too late. but for the average joe, if all you do is play for fun, then no age is too late to join chess.
Beginners are below 1000, modern world champs are above 2800. Average adult tournament player is something like 1500 or 1600. An 1800 rated player should be able to beat a proficient club player rated 1400 about 9 out of every 10 games, and might even beat a master on a rare occasion.
Elo is the rating system used in chess, and Elo 1300 means I'm a "decent social player".