Burn-in is possible with OLED, but not likely with normal use. Most "burn-in" is actually image retention, which goes away after a few minutes. You'll almost certainly see image retention long before it becomes permanent burn-in. Generally speaking, burn-in is something to be aware of, but not worry about.
Early OLED TVs did have trouble with this phenomenon, throwing the technology into question. But these days, nearly all of the OLED TVs on the market today are equipped with preventative measures to curb burn-in, and unless you're a very particular type of television viewer, you needn't worry about it at all.
No wonder why OLED TVs get their nickname “forever TVs”. They should last you for 10 years or more at 8-10 hours of watching per day, which proves these televisions are exceptionally durable devices. They are extremely delicate, so always handle them with care.
OLED uses organic materials that degrade over time, leading to a shorter lifespan than LED/LCD counterparts. While this may not be an issue for those who upgrade their TVs every few years, those planning to keep their television longer may consider this.
Reduce screen brightness: Lowering the screen brightness can reduce the risk of burn-in and also prolong the life of the OLED display. Avoid displaying static images: Try to avoid displaying static images, such as a navigation bar, for an extended period of time.
Those who display the same static content over long periods should consider the risk of burn-in, though (like those who watch lots of news, use the TV as a PC monitor, or play the same game with a bright static HUD). Those concerned about the risk of burn-in should go with an LCD TV for peace of mind.
Lifespan. LG has said their OLED TVs have a lifespan of 100,000 hours to half brightness, a figure that's similar to LED LCDs. Generally speaking, all modern TVs are quite reliable.
Besides the noted advantages of OLED display, some of the disadvantages include: Shorter lifetime then some other display technologies. This shorter lifetime is mainly due to the blue organic material but lifetime gets better all the time but is also due to moisture migration. Poor sunlight readability.
Is an OLED display worth it? If you have the money to spend and your priority is getting the best possible screen quality from your TV, smartphone or gadget, we'd say that OLED is absolutely worth the money.
OLED pixels very, very slowly get dimmer as they're used. In most cases this isn't an issue since you're watching varied content and all the pixels, on average, get used the same amount. But if you're only watching one thing, that one thing could cause uneven wear.
QLED TVs can get much brighter than OLED TVs because of the way OLED panels work compared to LED-LCD TVs. Alternatively, OLED TVs achieve perfect black levels and contrast, while QLED TVs often suffer from some light blooming in high-contrast scenes. OLED TVs have better off-angle viewing, too.
In terms of picture quality, OLED TVs are generally considered to be the better option due to their perfect blacks and infinite contrast. However, QLED TVs can still produce very high levels of brightness and colour accuracy, and they are often more affordable than OLED TVs.
This is typically 28,000 hours for red or green OLEDs, after which time the brightness of the screen will reduce by 50%.
One of the simplest ways to protect your OLED TV from burn-in and image retention is to adjust the settings according to your viewing habits and preferences. For example, you can lower the brightness, contrast, and OLED light levels to reduce the stress on the pixels and extend their lifespan.
Pausing is not a good idea as you might leave it again on a single image too long and cause yet another burn-in.
Sony stands out a little more for better overall color quality and any image-processing around objects where there is less blur on screen. Where LG stands out is with its alpha9 Gen4 AI processors that are in their most recent OLED TVs.
Unlike OLED, QLED displays can output higher brightness levels and aren't as susceptible to screen burn-in. QLED's color accuracy isn't far off from OLED either, as it uses Quantum-dots to accurately portray redder reds, bluer blues, and greener greens.
OLED TVs Are Susceptible to Burn-Ins
An OLED TV that you've been using for a long time may start to retain static images displayed on the screen for hours, like channel logos, for example. This occurs due to uneven degradation of pixels over a long period.
Professionals on Why OLED is Better for Eye Health
An OLED TV is not only beneficial for better sleep by emitting lower levels of bluelight but also a better choice to minimize eye strain as it is free from flickers or glares.
To sum it up, OLED displays are better for your eyesight. They have more natural lighting, better color contrast, and a wider color range. However, no matter what type of display you have, you will hurt your eyesight if you don't practice safe TV viewing.
The optimal choice will rely on your specific requirements. For instance, OLED is the way to go if picture quality is your top priority, but QLED is the better option if you are on a tighter budget. Typically, QLED and OLED TVs are Ultra High Definition (UHD) models, so you definitely have some options to consider.
In some cases, the reduction in blue light can result in half as much blue light being emitted when compared to LED/LCD panels. In short, this means OLED monitors are better for your eyes. It's important to reduce blue light as much as possible, as it's high energy visual light with the potential to be harmful.
If you're looking for a TV for a home theater or for primarily nighttime viewing, OLED is the way to go. You'll be able to better see content with darker backgrounds and have better picture quality overall. The only problem to consider with OLED picture quality is image retention or burn-in.
2. Screen Size. Even if you choose an LCD or OLED TV, the power consumption can be higher for large screen sizes. If you see the example of the latest LG C2 OLED TV, the 77-inch variant draws about 160 watts while the 65-inch variant draws only 115 watts.